The European Parliament in Strasbourg, France. / Credit: fotogoocom via Wikimedia (CC BY 3.0)

Vilnius, Lithuania, Dec 18, 2025 / 14:04 pm (CNA).

The European Parliament voted Dec. 17 in favor of a resolution supporting the creation of a new European Union fund intended to expand access to abortion services across member states, a move that exposed deep divisions among lawmakers and renewed debate over national sovereignty and abortion legislation in EU policymaking.

Members of the European Parliament meeting in Strasbourg voted 358 in favor, 202 against, with 79 abstentions. The proposal would establish a voluntary, opt-in financial mechanism to assist women who are unable to procure abortions in their home countries and who choose to travel to states with more permissive laws.

The initiative was brought forward under the EU’s European Citizens’ Initiative (ECI) framework by the campaign group My Voice, My Choice, which claims to represent a broad grassroots mobilization of European citizens.

Because the Dec. 17 vote concerned a nonbinding resolution rather than a legislative act, it carries no immediate legal effect. Nevertheless, supporters described the outcome as symbolically significant.

A nonbinding vote with an uncertain path forward

Despite parliamentary backing, the resolution does not compel the European Commission to act. Under ECI procedures, the commission is required to formally respond to the initiative within six months of its submission, by March 2026, outlining whether it intends to propose legislative or policy measures.

Even if the commission signals support, past experience suggests that endorsement does not always translate into concrete policy outcomes. Several previous citizen initiatives that met procedural thresholds ultimately stalled or were declined by the commission.

Opposition to the proposal was particularly strong among members from Hungary, where a majority of European Parliament members voted against the resolution. Polish representatives were nearly evenly split, with 23 voting in favor, 24 opposed, and one abstention. Delegations from Austria, Germany, Spain, Italy, France, and Lithuania also showed closely divided voting patterns, reflecting the ongoing cultural and political disagreement across Europe on abortion policy.

Critics of the pro-abortion proposal, including family advocacy groups, religious organizations, and lawmakers, argued that health care and medical practice remains a matter of national competence under EU treaties. They warned that creating a centralized funding mechanism for abortion risks circumventing national laws and democratic processes.

The vote came after the Commission of the Bishops’ Conferences of the European Union urged voters in the Parliament to pursue “prudent policies that genuinely protect and support women, while also safeguarding unborn human life.”

“A medical intervention [abortion] of such gravity and with such important ethical implications cannot and must not be normalized,” the bishops said. 

Beyond the vote itself, My Voice, My Choice has drawn criticism for its public advocacy methods. Following a Nov. 13 European Parliament vote to include the campaign within the Gender Equality Strategy 2025, the group used social media to publish images of European Parliament members who voted against the inclusion.

The posts grouped lawmakers by country, displayed their social media handles, and encouraged members of the public to tag and convince them to support the initiative. 

Some observers described the tactic as coercive or distasteful, while others, including some pro-life advocates, argued it inadvertently clarified to the public which politicians value the dignity of human life as they oppose abortion expansionism. 

On Nov. 26, the European Centre for Law and Justice convened a conference in Brussels attended by pro-life members of the European Parliament, civil society leaders, and representatives of the Federation of Catholic Family Associations in Europe. Women shared personal testimonies related to abortion, and speakers addressed what they described as increasingly top-down advocacy strategies behind My Voice, My Choice.

During the conference, organizers presented a funding analysis examining the organizations supporting the campaign. According to the report, among the more than 250 organizations listed as supporters, a significant number receive funding from EU institutions and large American philanthropic foundations.

The report identified funding streams from organizations such as the Open Society Foundation, the Gates Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the MacArthur Foundation, and the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, as well as direct EU funding. Several prominent pro-abortion organizations across Europe were shown to have long-standing financial ties to these donors.

My Voice, My Choice’s principal organizer, Nika Kovač, a Slovenian anthropologist who heads the 8th of March Institute, is linked in the report as having her organization receive funding from the Open Society Foundation and support from the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF). 

Additionally, according to the report, IPPF’s European branch has received millions of euros in funding over the past two decades from the European Union and major U.S.-based foundations.

The report does not allege illegality but rather examines the democratic character of the initiative, specifically, whether the ECI mechanism in this case reflects organic citizen mobilization or functions primarily as a vehicle through which well-funded advocacy networks advance preexisting policy goals under the banner of popular participation.